Dear Praveen, You have assumed the questions on my behalf .BUT I will frame my questions in few days.Hope fully you will be able to reply. .After that i conclude my discussion. I know that Redhat is open source leader and it will go beyond GPL and it is acording to them Redhat is not violating GPL as many of persons have posted reply to me collectively and individually. Even i am doing research on internet and read many times the article published by Linux For You.the article title is : Is it illegal to redistribute RHEL?.Published in september 2008. I am very much thankful for your meaningful and cool discussion.But I respectfully differ to your meaning of RHEL is an aggregation of GPL software. As long as the aggregate license does not restricts the rights granted to individual components under GPL, the aggregate itself does not have to be GPL... Please read the following and then you reply.I really appreciate how cool way you have replied and i am able to understand your explaination though i may differ.i respectfully read every sentence of yours.After reading please reply even if you differ on my explaination.After reading your post i visted all the website you gave me the link and studied the content.Still i have to improve and yet implement the posting style.But i learn very shortly.
This is my reply; I would suggest you to read the GPL itself fully once more. Section 5 says http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html "A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate." The above paragraph is self explanatory. But I respectfully differ on to your meaning of aggregation. My Meaning of aggregation :In any Linux distribution compilation is called an aggregation of GPL software(covered work) and separate and independent works (Linux Based Commercial non GPL Software). Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate means other separate and independent works ." other separate and independent works means any other commercial Linux based software included in the distribution does not have to be GPL..With Regards . M.S.Yatnatti _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/