On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) <dines...@gmail.com> wrote: > H! > > I have posted a rebuttal about a misleading article about netbook > security @ http://dineshah.wordpress.com/ > > The links to original articles are there in the post but I am > including here as well. > > http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE52201120090303 > > http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=d1b8ded8-f7be-448b-88b2-7226ac01200d >
Let me play the devils advocate here. Why do we care about this magazine article? Simply because it doesn't acknowledge GNU/Linux? The fact remains that windows machines without antivirus' and firewalls ARE insecure and that's all the article states. Granted, the article has zero research behind it and entitles the reader to a rant about the steady decline of quality in journalism but why are we venting it out on a Linux mailing list? -- Anupam _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
