Even though I have several IP's? Shouldn't the ports be different for every
IP? Guess I am using a port then, damn... Thanks for the info!
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WebMail Port 80
Yes, in fact I do this, as do a few others I know of on this list. The
problem is that you can't run it that way AND run a web server on the same
machine, at the same time. Both would vie for port 80. I had no problem
setting it up.
Anthony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 7:34 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] WebMail Port 80
> Is it possible to use port 80 for webmail, so you can just type
> http://mail.domain.com to access
> it instead of using a port? I have tried several times, but seems to
block
> it out and can't find the page. The IP it is using doesn't have a web
> server on it and is ONLY assigned to the email server.
> Thanks for any info,
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madscientist
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] BlackHole list
>
>
> Speaking of that... We've been begging for a feature that puts a reference
> into messages when they are redirected by a forwarding rule. (We use
global
> rules for spam filtering.) This would really help refine the filters when
a
> legitimate mail gets caught... As it is now, there's no way to figure out
> which rule did what when a valid email gets snagged by the filter...
>
> _Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Bennett
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] BlackHole list
>
>
> I agree. How does this sound for an implementation:
>
> Simply have the SMTP server look up the IP address of the sender (doesn't
it
> already do this for reverse DNS?), check to see if it's in the RBL, and
add
> a "X-SenderInRBL: [IP address]" to the message. Then you can filter
> messages by that header. If only certain users want to participate, they
> can (by filtering in their own mail client).
>
> Seems like this would be fairly easy and unobtrusive.
>
> Any comments? (Especially from Ipswitch...)
>
> Kevin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Willis
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 2:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [IMail Forum] BlackHole list
>
>
> Ok I don't know if you all have ever talked about this here, but have any
of
> you ever seen a blackhole list ??
>
> http://maps.vix.com/rbl/
>
> I have heard that the main writers of Imail are not interested in
supporting
> this standard.
>
> This has been around for a number of years and I and my customers would
like
> to see it supported by Imail.
>
> <snipped>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
