I believe the original block against Harris was before they had ANY opt-in
procedures. Before it got to court, Harris agreed in an out of court
settlement to use opt-in, but MAPS wanted them to use double opt-in and they
disagreed. I think this is why it is going back to court.
Personally, I would be real happy if double opt-in was law...
Sheldon
_____________________________
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partner
Ten Forward Communications
http://www.tenforward.com
_____________________________
Amateurs built the Ark.
Professionals built the Titanic.
----- Original Message -----
From: "NetQuick Email Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] anti-virus solution
> The folks at RBL and Harris & Real are in court over this. The RBL
> folks do not like the opt-in set-up that Harris & Real use. They have a
> multiple confirmation requirement that is in dispute. Harris & Real have
> not had complaints but were placed there due to the volume of Email they
> send.
>
> Kevin Childers
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
