andyb wrote:
> spoken with true linux/unix bias....
>
> I've been doing DNS on NT for almost 7 years without any issues....
>
> Hey, if you know and like NT, and are comfortable with it...don't
> reinvent the wheel by switching to an OS you don't know...
>From the direction this thread was taking
>
> SB> I concur. I just finally upgraded my secondary DNS from a P60 with 16 Megs
> SB> of RAM that had been running Bind perfectly well for the last three years.
> SB> And I only upgraded because I wanted a rack-mountable server. (I upgraded
> SB> to a use P200 with 64Megs used off EBAY).
> ...
> >>If I want to do a caching and recursives, could I resonably expect any of
> >>the following to work out?
> >>486-66 (probably laughter here)
> >>Pentium 75
> >>Pentium Pro (I have a variety of these)
> ...
> SB> On win32, esp on W2K, I wouldn�t go with less than 128 megs, due to OS
> SB> memory consumption.
I got the impression the issue was minimizing hardware requirements.
Win-NT is not the approach to take for that :-)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] �The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote.� � Ambassador Kosh
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
