Now I think we're more together. Your system ultimately provides the end
user with the ability to define spam for themselves and also provides ample
flexibility with regard to errors.

As for your wonderings... you can bet that there are a lot of hotshot
lawyers wondering that as well, which is why it is critical to be up-front
about filtering in your AUP/TOS. Users must know that messages might be
filtered and must agree to hold you harmless.

Hope this helps,
_M

| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael E.
| Middleton
| Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 11:54 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rules.ima
|
|
| > altered a bit. Suppose the legitimate subscribers are receiving an
| > investment newsletter about their portfolio. Suppose the unhappy
| > subscriber
| > gets a pump-and-dump spam and complains, then suppose that your new rule
| > somehow blocks the legitimate investment news letter because they appear
| > identical. Next day, the legitimate newsletter advises it's
| subscribers to
| > drop Enron just in time for them to save millions... but they
| > never get that
| > newsletter.
|
| Well, UCE is UCE... and it's not a "gray area".  The problem you've raised
| is false-positives...
|
| Here's what we do:
| 1. All inbound items go first to our EmailScrub server where they are
| checked for viruses and trojans. Positives are bounced back to the sender
| with a notice to the intended recipient...  virus-free email is passed on.
| 2. Next they are 'razor'ed by spamassassin... and given a numeric score.
| Clearly 0 is clean, 25 is spam. We currently add {SPAM?} to the
| subject line
| of any that score 6.6 or higher. Members of this forum may benefit from
| looking at spamassassin and the tests they run and values assigned.
| 3. All items are passed to Imail where individual customers or IT guys for
| larger sites maintain rules.ima.  We recommend the use of TRASH folders.
|
| What I'd like to do is participate in a forum to share ideas for tuning
| rules.ima.  I'm not worried about Spammers sueing me or about my customers
| not getting important investment newsletters because we don't delete Email
| and our customers maintain their own rules.ima (with our help).
|
| But you have me wondering if someone tried to send me an Email notice to
| sell Cisco when it was $54 and I didn't get it and if I could find out who
| deleted that Email I can sue them for the $30 grand I've lost.
|
| Mike
|
|
| Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
| to be removed from this list.
|
| An Archive of this list is available at:
| http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
|
|


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to