I have some other questions:

1) Is there a way to limit the size of a message that SMTP handles?  I did
notice today that there were some 20MB messages going through.   I know you
can set mailbox limits, but how can you limit a user from sending that 20MB
file?

Is there a tool that will globally allow me to set limits on all the virtual
accounts I have?

How can I use the SMTP logs (which are often hard to open, or scroll by too
fast in the sys logger (which I now turned off, from which I could determine
nothing consistent, but then again, It goes by too fast, or I can't read
it.)) to track the sender/receipient of the large messages?  Is there some
log analysis tool availalbe?

Things are stable right now, cause the load is lighter, I assume.

-Kelly






> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanford
> Whiteman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:22 PM
> To: Kelly Britt
> Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Upgraded from 6.x to 7.x and feeling
> frustrated.
>
>
> > These machines were the Intel ISP series, the use the Inteal 82559 Fast
> > Ethernet Lan on Motherboard
>
> Swap it.
>
> > How do you defrag a highly active mail server with 1000s of users?
>
> "Highly  active,"  again, requires metrics so that we can compare with
> successful configurations.
>
> The  more  active,  the  more  urgent  the need to defrag. If it takes
> downtime  for  scheduled  maintenance,  do  it  anyway--hey, would you
> rather  be  rebooting,  and  getting  no  help from the list until you
> defrag?  There's  no  reason to leave out the essential step on easily
> fragged filesystems. Remember, it'll take less time to defrag the more
> often you do it.
>
> > I  did  create  a  new  empty  spool  directory on a newly formatted
> > partition on a separate drive.
>
> ...and now for the mailbox drive.
>
> > I take it from the "here we go again" comment that this is a typical
> > problem for users upgraded. Maybe the product just sucks?
>
> It  would  appear  from  reports that 7.x is less tolerant of bad NICs
> than  6.x.  It  also  does  have  more overhead in general, so is more
> sensitive  to  fragmentation, storage load balancing, et al. You would
> need to already have problems for 7.x to point up these areas.
>
> -Sandy
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to