I must be missing something. If it is against the rules to reject null senders, why is the option available? Shouldn't that be against the rules as well (aiding and abetting)?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:IMail_Forum-owner@;list.ipswitch.com]On Behalf Of Smart Business > Lists > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:10 AM > To: David Cuneo Justin > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] RFC-2821 violation > > > David, > Friday, November 15, 2002 you wrote: > DCJ> which is does anyone have any information regarding to liability > DCJ> clause's for placing in an email sent through a list serve and > DCJ> for client responsibility? > > No, I don't. Are you wanting the entire list to send you a "no"? > > If you post something and don't get an answer on this list it > usually means no one has an answer. We are not in the habit of > answering "no" when we have no answer. > > DCJ> Seems to me that would be more of an issue than the emails > DCJ> themselves, as sending 3k of messages impress's me less than not > DCJ> getting a 300k lawsuit slapped on for negligence. > > Well, if you are disallowing null senders you are already > negligent. That's something that is known and can be fixed. > > Terry Fritts > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
