Um, Len? "Such behavior" as 100 users sending from behind the same NAT
router  is  not  legit?
nope. They're effectively equivalent to DUL. Their mail clients should be sending to their org's SMTP gateway where their highly qualified and professional mail admin would be able to track their behavior in the SMTP logs. Their org's firewall people should block outbound port 25 access just like ISP's do.

They should not be sending to Internet MX's.

So, let's say they do send, are forced to send their mail to the org's SMTP gateway. It's statistically infinitesimal when an single ip has legitimately to open 100 simultaneous connects to public MX. Such behavior is self-incriminating.

Here's the STMPD connections stats to an IMGate box protecting 5000 mailboxes, from 00:00 to 14:00 hours Tuesday:

Host/Domain Summary: Messages Received (top 30)
msg cnt bytes host/domain
-------- ------- -----------
525 43163k aol.com
517 5896k returns.groups.yahoo.com
319 6052k yahoo.com
305 8430k hotmail.com
166 1758k from=<>
153 8088k columbus.rr.com
133 2367k ebay.com
127 970k lyris.depoconnect.com
118 442435 rootsweb.com
115 2974k newsletter.online.com
108 536k newmailbox.com
99 473134 js615.com
98 4148k msn.com
87 2130k vds.com
83 3988k unsubscribe.myfamily.com
83 408481 midrange.com
82 296783 list.ipswitch.com
78 341456 marketwatchmail.com
71 1377k earthlink.net
68 2385k juno.com
66 322208 untinc.com
63 1398k ochsendorf.com
61 169883 crochetpartners.org
59 943k ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
59 555k clearance.overstock.com
58 805k compuserve.com
57 298678 4funnytaf.com

So all of aol's connections of 500/14 hours = less that one connection/minute.

So how do you get from that to 100 simultaneous connections ever being legit?

or even 100 connections/hour?

can't get there from here. :))

Hmm...that's  happening at thousands of legit
sites as we speak...
no, it isn't.

guess we should shut 'em down, then. :)
yep, don't even blink, Just Do It.

All sending from behind their NATs to one MX SIMULTANEOUSLY, is certainly not legit. And they are DUL, they should not be sending to MX's but to their org's SMTP server.

Methinks  you're not answering Scott's question as presented.
Who care's what the question was, when one has all the answers??  :))

Len


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to