Hi, I would also like a copy
==================================== Am Montag, 24. Mai 2004 um 17:41 schrieben Sie: > Todd, > I would also like a copy... > David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Bierbaum > Sent: Friday, 21 May, 2004 17:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments) > I totally agree. I have a nice long rule that filters over 57 dangerous > file attachments. The exact list was obtained from a open source > program called MIMEdefang. > I have been working with IPSwitch support to resolve an issue with the > when the e-mail matches the rule, if forwards it on to an e-mail > address. The problem I'm having is that it's truncating the first 14 > characters of the e-mail address that I specify. The rule works when I > set to bounce, but I want my outgoing rules to replay back to my senders > and notify them that they can't send that attachment. > ANYWAY, I would be glad to provide a copy of these rules to anyone who > is interested. > Todd Bierbaum - Microsoft Certified Professional > BankTrust > office 850-835-3335 ext 106 > cell 850-598-3993 > -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > notify the system manager and the sender. > -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris > Langsenkamp > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments) > I wish more mail admins would take bad mail seriously, and virus scan > both inbound and outbound for viruses an other assorted trash. We're > more tuned in, and more likely to have better, more up-to-date software, > and frankly we have to have it anyway on our systems for our own > protection, so scanning the mail that moves through our system should > cost us very little, and benefits so many ...many beyond our own > individual customer bases. > One of these days mail admins will unite and put the RFC's and standards > up on a pedestal, maybe fixing what we collectively think is broken, and > then we'll say to the world, "There - comply or you can't function with > anyone! We're not gonna tolerate it any more!" Legislation doesn't > kill spam or network abuse, but lazy administration and over-tolerance > to bent/broken rules and standards has contributed to the problem. If > we stand together and draw a line in the sand a lot of things might > stop, or at least be laregley reduced... > One of these days I'll get the attic cleaned out too......fat chance > either way.... > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Matrosity Tech Support > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:56 PM > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments) > It's interesting that we (ISP's) have been roped into taking care of > Viruses for our customers rather than them paying for their own > Antivirus software. > I resolved the problem by deleting any email that comes in with > attachments with the common problem extensions. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Geater > 5/3/04 > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments) >> RE: "If I needed to send someone a legitimate "dot" exe file, I change >> the extension to "ex_" before I send it, since my recipient would be >> expecting the file to arrive anyway." >> >> I wish all users were like this but.. alas... they are not :( > Actually, I have a rationale that says none of my users need "dot" exe > files. > In the Windows 98 world, where all this originated, it made sense to > block them because they would execute and install without administrative > privilege. Now that all my 2k and XP users are set up as "less than > administrator", it's not so much an issue anymore. > However, I have noticed that more ISPs use Imail than I originally > expected. In that line of work, you have to have that clearinghouse, I > suppose, else your customers get really bent. > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ ==================================== -- Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen ==================================== Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 1 391 30 00 Fax: +41 1 391 32 49 mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 ==================================== To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
