I agree regarding the management! Our company is not very good at the deployment. Our server manager does not like us using Logon Scripts, so that really hurts when trying to deploy new version of products.
The NT Client Rollout from the SSC works...but there is something about it I just don't completely trust. It works a bit better with the updated SSC that comes with SAV 9 CE. We still rely on a lot of manual work to install updates to apps, not only SAV but Office, Acrobat, etc. Anything. But the management is the best! We tried the Network Associated ePO and it was crap! Just wish the Symantec Client Firewall was as good as the antivirus. Or as good as Imail! Love Imail! So easy to use...and so cheap! Try comparing it's pricing to Exchange. We will never go to Exchange because of the costs involved. But why would we want to? Imail is perfect. And so easy! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Saturday, 24 July 2004 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SAV Mail Gateway [WAS Anti-virus] Yep ineffecient, but every release is a leap ahead of the previous one. I would guess the businesses that are using it are using it because it is part of their NAV subscription. For us it adds redundant gatways and AV scanning at no additional cost from our desktop scanning and the corporate desktop management and deployment is by far the best we have tested. Kevin Bilbee > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SAV Mail Gateway [WAS Anti-virus] > > > > >I think everyone should suggeest to symantes to add a list > of accounts > >to accept mail for. That way mail to non existant accounts will be > >stoped at the gateway > > yep, how stupid and inefficient is it to AV scan every single > arriving msg > when 80% is spam, may 50% is for recipients that don't even > exist? Plus > Norton SAV backscatter is viciously notorious. > > Norton SAV gateway, or anything that screws up equivalently, is an > architectural disaster. "Not that there's anything wrong with that." > > AV scanning is so expensive, it should be the LAST step > before mailbox > delivery, scanning only the msgs that have passed through all other > filtering, NOT the first step out as the per-recipient-ignorant MX. > > Len > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on > 1000's of sites > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
