|
So anyone currently running the Symantec solution for Imail
will be in this position when their current license runs out? Well isn't
that sweet. Guess we'll be making plans to get away from Imail then at that
rate. What the heck do I need all that other overhead (ICS) for?
Grrrrr. From: Tony Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS Hello all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am
having with IP Switch, along with a recommendation on AV products.
We currently run IMail 8.05 at a school, and it
runs perfectly for what we need. Our AV is expiring, and IP Switch is
telling us that they will no longer supply an AV renewal, and to maintain our AV
protection, we will need to go to the ICS (mucho $$$$$). We feel this is
incredibly bogus, as we are satisfied with the product we have now, and all we
want to do is upgrade our AV patterns.
I have spoken with IPSwitch, and they are telling
me 'this is the way it is'. I wanted to hear from others their experiences
and thoughts.
To get around this, we are thinking about
integrating a third party AV with our MX Guard SPAM filter. It integrates
with FPROT, CLAM, and NAI. I wanted to get some opinions and experiences
with others who have utilized this method, and what AV they felt was
best.
Thanks for your time,
TN
|
- RE: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - ... Jason Loven
- Re: [IMail Forum] Expiring ... Matrosity Tech Support
- RE: [IMail Forum] Expir... Guy Deslauriers
- RE: [IMail Forum] E... George Dailey [Tech]
- RE: [IMail Forum] Expiring ... Jim Mc Cay
- RE: [IMail Forum] Expir... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Forum] E... Rod Dorman
- RE: [IMail Foru... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Foru... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] Expiring ... Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
- Re: [IMail Forum] Expir... Kevin Rogers
