Mark,
I was wondering about something now that this issue has come up... I
seem to recall that a release announcement or some such message
indicated there should be some performance improvement in the operation
of 2006 imap. After you complete this fix do you expect the performance
of the traditional UNIX mailbox format to be a) the same as 2004g, b)
better than 2004g or c) worse than 2004g ??? I doubt it's the last one
but will it be better than 2004g?
thanks,
David
Mark Crispin wrote:
I have discovered and verified the cause of the performance problem
with traditional UNIX mailbox files.
I am developing a fix, and expect to release imap-2006b with the fix
on Friday.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
