On Wed, 5 May 2010, Paul Vixie wrote:
i must have spoken improperly. if i say "scan" and learn thereby about messages 1,3,5,20 and then one month later after every computer has been power cycled four times i say "show 5" i want the same message.
Oh. In that case, what you want are UIDs.
imap's statefulness isn't nearly persistent enough for me.
Actually, it would be if the mh code could implement UIDs correctly. The problem is that the the mh code uses the filename numbers as the UID; but then has to account for the mh compact command, which renumbers all the files. If you never use the compact command, then IMAP UIDs would be just what you need. Otherwise, you need to have some other means to tie a permanent UID to a particular message, while preserving the IMAP requirement of being strictly ascending in the mailbox. -- Mark -- http://panda.com/mrc Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote. _______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list Imap-uw@u.washington.edu http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
