On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:50 -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> That was my thinking in wanting to do this here (on imap5).  But
> because this list was chartered for a different purpose, there's
> (reasonable) concern that there will be distractions in both
> directions if we temporarily hijack it for this one.
> 
> I will probably propose to the IESG that we accept this as an
> exception, and use the <[email protected]> list that's already
> there.  That fits better in its purpose, but puts a new WG mailing
> list off of IETF premises.  The IESG has stopped short of saying that
> should never happen, but has a strong preference against it.  So I
> want everyone to be prepared in case we choose to create a new list.

Would it be possible to create a more generic list for "Any new
IMAP-related workgroups"? I'd even prefer if it was somehow aliased to
morg list (so that they would really be the same list but with two
addresses/names), but I guess that's too much trouble.


_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5

Reply via email to