On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: >On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >>A mailbox can be subscribed to twice, which does not make any sense, >>whatsoever. >If an interpretation does not make sense, that should be a clue that >there is something wrong with the interpretation, and that an alternative >interpretation should be found.
I give in here, and agree with the interpretation that adding to set in this case implicitly means add-if-not-present. I would hope that the RFC could cover the case of subscribing to an already subscribed folder, and explicitly state that the server in such a case must answer NO. Right now I'm unsure whether to say "OK Already subscribed" (because the mailbox has been successfully added to the set) or "NO Already subscribed". Andreas -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg2
