You may already be familiar with this, but there was also a short blurb on missing data in a recent issue of the APA Monitor (Vol 33, #7, July/August 2002). Essentially, it spoke to the need to become more sophisticated in treatments of missing data, interviewed a couple journal editors, etc. It may be useful as well.
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick S. Malone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IMPUTE: Re: Satisfying reviewers Thanks for the replies, public and private. It turns out a colleague had bought me the Allison book a while back, but I hadn't dug into it; I found it shortly after sending the first note. I think the Schafer & Graham paper will probably satisfy the editor (she wants experts? we can give her experts!). Pat On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:15:13 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allison, P.D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, Sage. > > Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state > of the art. Psychological Methods, Vol 7(2), 147-177. -- Patrick S. Malone, Ph.D., Research Scholar Duke University Center for Child and Family Policy Durham, North Carolina, USA e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.duke.edu/~malone/
