We could just get a VI vs. Emacs debate going (the Linux vs. Solaris debate would probably be a little one sided on this list), I'm sure the bickering would be far more productive ;)
Moinak Ghosh wrote: > Hi, > > ------ Background: > It has been mentioned several time here that the techniques, > approaches and code etc. in BeleniX for an useful bas for what > Indiana is trying to achieve in the initial phase. A useful > starting point. And obviously, stuff in the Livekit, that was > initially derived from BeleniX do form the base set of required > technologies for Indiana. > > Indiana has a lot of roadmap ahead and being intended as an open > community project will benefit other distros. Thus things that > will be coming, like packaging/installer enhancements, network > repository etc. would benefit BeleniX as well. > > ------ End of background > > Now being a long time KDE fan myself, I still do see the > blindingly obvious sense that it makes for the Indiana project > to leverage off all the Gnome work that has happened in the > OpenSolaris community. > > However I am committed to the effort to make KDE full-featured > and fully-functional on OpenSolaris and that is why KDE is the > default desktop in BeleniX. > > So I see BeleniX continuing as the KIndiana variant with focus > on KDE. Isn't this enough to put an end to all this bickering > over KDE and Gnome and focus on the critical requirements ? > > Regards, > Moinak. > > > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > > !SIG:46a23405156531625620141! > > _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
