I agree that it will be useful to have a summary of what we've discussed without wanting to preempt any decisions made.
Glynn and I will get something up there in the next few days. Patrick Glynn Foster wrote: > Hey Rajiv, > > Rajiv Gunja wrote: >> Hello, >> I have been seeing a lot of threads discussing about features, wish >> lists and arguments as to which Open Source packages is to be >> used/included. Its all fine for the moment. Soon someone from the >> Project Leaders' team need to decide/discuss/freeze the feature list and >> the software list that will be going into Indiana. If not what we will >> see if a bloat from a CD-image to a DVD-image. Also, how close to >> Solaris or Linux distribution is Indiana going to be? Will it be a true >> desktop or will be a Off-shoot of Solaris but will be a look alike of >> Linux in certain areas? > > Absolutely agree, and we're trying to do this to some extents. I'm not too > concerned about freezing stuff before a first prototype, but after that we'll > need to start working towards a set of milestones (something that I'm trying > to > sit down and come up with a rough proposal right now). > >> If in fact things are moving along, can the Indiana web-page be updated >> so we know as to the game plan. > > I'll take all the blame on that front - I'm starting to put more focus into > providing some more solid detail on the project website. I've been traveling > solidly for the last month, and just getting around to picking up the pace on > other aspects of Indiana again. > > If you have some comments for what you'd like or expect to see there, feel > free > to share them. > > > Glynn > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
