Ian says it is my job to pick, at least for Solaris.
For OpenSolaris, it should be a community decision.
But if the community wants me to pick, I would probably go with ksh93.
On Aug 7, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Chris Pickett wrote:
On 8/7/07, Marc Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sun's expectations are that large Linux customers will move first
to the
Project Indiana binary distribution built on OpenSolaris, not to
Solaris 10.
So I very much endorse the notion that we make Project Indiana as
seamless
as possible for people moving from Linux. At some point in the
future, when
we rev our commercial Solaris distro to make it based on Indiana,
Sun can
decide exactly how to handle the compatibility with our Solaris 10
install
base. But for now, I'm hoping the community focuses on making it
as seamless
as possible for non Solaris users to use OpenSolaris/Indiana.
What does it mean for the /bin/sh problem? Maybe you or Ian should
make an executive decision: Pick a shell (ksh93 or bash) and get it
integrated as /bin/sh.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
| / IT consultant
===m==m=== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
Marc Hamilton
Vice President, Solaris Marketing
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://blogs.sun.com/marchamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
