Keith Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Josh Hurst wrote: > >>> >>> I hope Indiana is going to set this build flag to 'ksh' by default. >> >> +1 >> >> Shipping ksh88 as /bin/ksh in Indiana would be a disaster - first >> Opensolaris promises to replace the old ksh88 with a far superior >> ksh93, invests a year of development and then we neglect the promise >> and work. We'd be in deep dooo-doo if this happens. Neither would it >> be a good omen for other Opensolaris projects. >> > > I don't think anyone suggested that. The question, as I understood > it, was would the thing called ksh be the Solaris traditional one or > not (with ksh93 already in as ksh93). >
Given that the (snipped) list was of components that were both closed *and* non-redistributable, I would have thought the fact that ksh88 is hard or impossible to include was obvious. Given the stated goals regarding redistributability. That said, I want no part of yet another foolish ksh93 based argument, so tag, you're it. :-) -- Rich _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
