On 07/08/07, Marc Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian says it is my job to pick, at least for Solaris. > For OpenSolaris, it should be a community decision. > But if the community wants me to pick, I would probably go with ksh93.
Given that ksh93 is likely to be more compatible with Solaris shell scripts written for /bin/sh, I would be inclined to pick it. If I had a choice, I wouldn't allow scripts to use /bin/sh at all, since it doesn't really indicate *which* shell the script was really written for thanks to the horrible assumption that /bin/sh is bash on GNU/Linux distributions. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
