Ivan Wang wrote: >> David Lloyd wrote: >>> Brandorr, >>> >>>> Did I miss something? Did we even figure out what >> the Indiana Brand is >>>> yet? (e.g. Does it have a name, logo, etc?) >>> I don't know what Indiana is meant to represent; >> I'm quite happy with >>> SXCE myself. Indiana is something that may as well >> start with Ian whose >>> second part stars with D. >>> >>> Other than that snide remark, I'm watching it >> closely. >>> In other words: >>> >>> * Why should I, happy SXCE user, use Indiana >> instead of SXCE >> >> >> I think you'll probably have a bit more flexibility >> in the long run. > > Ugh, I am not very sure about the flexibility here, you mean the flexibility > of ...?
Smaller install, easier install, ability to re-distribute, features to customize from network repositories, new distribution model, etc. All of that makes the system more flexible and more appealing to more levels of developers and users. And some of it has been in the works for some time now. Jim _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
