On 02/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sara Dornsife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > As other distros cannot use the brand name, it would be bad if Sun > > > > > used it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have been discussing TM guidelines and usage scenarios for the past > > > > two weeks. We are working to create NEW guidelines. Yes, the current > > > > (past) guidelines have been restrictive. I'd like to see you work with > > > > the rest of us on how to create new guidelines that work better for all > > > > distributions. > > > > > > We had this discussion long ago and we decided that it was a bad idea to > > > allow > > > a distribution to use the name OpenSolaris. I do not see anything that > > > would > > > change the constraints here. > > > > Who's this mysterious we? > > THe OpenSolaris community. Maybe you have not been in that time.
No, I wasn't part of the pilot project and since that was under NDA, I don't think there's much point in referencing any decisions from that time. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
