According to my cognitive approach, it is a conceptual blend which fuses various activities of God/s and in this way the artists try to express their manifestation beyond time-space limits, i. e. the viśvarūpa manifestation (rūpa means not only "form, shape", but also "deed" (karman), see BU 1.4.7: tad dhedaṃ tarhy avyākṛtam āsīt | tan *nāmarūpābhyām eva vyākriyatāsau nāmāyam idaṃrūpa* iti | tad idam apy etarhi nāmarūpābhyām eva vyākriyata asau nāmāyam idaṃrūpa iti | sa eṣa iha praviṣṭa ā nakhāgrebhyo yathā kṣuraḥ kṣuradhāne 'vahitaḥ syād viśvambharo vā viśvambharakulāye | taṃ na paśyanti | akṛtsno hi saḥ *prāṇann* eva prāṇo nāma bhavati | *vadan* vāk *paśyaṃś* cakṣuḥ *śṛṇvañ* chrotraṃ *manvāno* manaḥ | tāny asyaitāni *karmanāmāny eva* |)
Conceptual blends integrate concepts relating to disparate experiences, which often are in opposition to everyday cognition and experience of the world, and are thus suitable for describing an absolute reality that exists outside of time and space and manifests itself in them. Each arm expresses one activity, in the blend (especially a visual blend) we get access to all of them. Regards, Joanna --- Prof. dr hab. Joanna Jurewicz Katedra Azji Południowej /Chair of South Asia Studies Wydział Orientalistyczny / Faculty of Oriental Studies Uniwersytet Warszawski /University of Warsaw ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28 00-927 Warszawa , Poland Członek Academia Europaea Przewodnicząca Rady Programowej Festiwalu Nauki Department of Linguistidcs and Modern Languages College of Human Sciences,UNISA, Pretoria, RSA Member of Academia Europaea Chairperson of the Science Festival Programme Council https://uw.academia.edu/JoannaJurewicz pt., 17 maj 2024 o 14:04 Rolf Heinrich Koch via INDOLOGY < [email protected]> napisał(a): > One theory resulting from my fieldwork: Remodeling. > > According to a Sinhalese mansucript, a handbook for artists in > non-standard Sanskrit ślokas, I read e.g. Viṣṇu has to be modelled with two > hands for his two attributes. The artist used the existing sculpture > depicting an earlier two armed god. He added two arms for the > Viṣṇu-Attributes. Now we got Viṣṇu with four arms. > Later, new Viṣṇu-scuptures are modeled with four arms. > > Best > > Heiner > Am 17.05.2024 um 13:20 schrieb François Voegeli via INDOLOGY: > > Dear Members of the List, > > A friend recently asked me a rather disconcerting question (for me at > least): why do Indian gods have so many arms? > > My understanding was that these arms bear attributes of the god (trident, > discus, severed head, etc.) to remind the devout of some parts of the god's > gest, but I have not seen such explanation in Indian litterature. > What is the Indian literature exactly saying about this quite remarkable > feature and where (Purāṇas, Śilpaśāstras, or elsewhere)? > > Your input will be very much appreciated. > Thanks in advance. > > François Voegeli > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing > [email protected]https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology > > -- > Dr. Rolf Heinrich Kochwww.rolfheinrichkoch.wordpress.com > > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology >
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
