On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> </snip> >> >> I originally thought that Infinispan's storeAsBinary can be used for this, >> but apparently not without some additional changes/tweaks. Maybe we need: >> >> 1) A new config option for this behaviour. <storeAsBinary defensive="true" >> /> ? >> 2) If enabled, maybe use a subclass of MarshalledValue >> (DefensiveMarshalledValue?) that *always* stores a byte[] and never caches >> the object representation? >> >> >> I think we'd still need to cache the object instance while the command is >> executing, otherwise we'll have too many deserializations. But perhaps the >> new setting could control whether MarshalledValueInterceptor calls >> MarshalledValue.compact with preferSerializedRepresentation == true instead >> of false, as it does now. > > Well, you will want eager serialisation too, even in local mode. So that > would have to be built in. So maybe rather than a MarshalledValue subclass, > we really need a MarshalledValueInterceptor subclass. Even easier/better > encapsulated. :) > > > That sounds good to me. ^ I gave that a go and worked pretty nicely with minimal changes. Cheers, -- Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
