Hi Noel,

>I don't quite understand your point.  Are you saying that "cvs edit -c" and 
>(the
>forthcoming) "cvs ci -c" isn't enough?  If so, why not?

Don't you worry - I remember about "cvs edic -c" path. I think that at the 
moment we are talking about what to do with the current "cvs admin -l". I am 
that close to say to remove it completely, however I like the idea of having 
it under control better. I believe that completely removing it will do no 
good...

BR,
Jerzy

The first thing they don't teach you at school: "Never say never".
All the issues not related to the list please send to me in private, thanks.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to