On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote: > Why convert from SCCS? I don't have any larger projects managed by SCCS, > but for all the small ones I have there's not much point to changing over > to RCS (or CVS) -- I just keep using SCCS.... :-)
Ok, well this is moving away from the topic I'd prefer, that being the sccs2rcs script issue, but... Well, at this moment, we have 1835 SCCS directories and an absolute ton of source. SCCS isn't the fastest thing to use -- I believe RCS blows it out of the water in the most common case of getting the most recent version out of the repository -- especially on NFS mounted disk, this gets to be an issue. Perhaps more importantly, our development is moving almost entirely to Linux and the free SCCS support on Linux is lacking (CSSC isn't recommended by the author). We'd also like to completely change our development scheme and move to CVS with maintainers of various subsystems accepting patches from developers similar to the free software model, but in-house. Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
