Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:11:23 -0800
From: Ian Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lovelace.corp.google.com ([unix socket])
by lovelace.corp.google.com (Cyrus v2.1.2) with LMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2002
+16:00:45 -0800
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Even though the return path is wrong, it's still fully qualified, so
why doesn't Cyrus try to send the vacation reponse to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
When Cyrus puts the return-path into the message, it qualifies it
with the value of 'servername' (defaulting to gethostname()). It
doesn't pass that qualification to the Sieve subsystem.
Thus Sieve attempts to send a message to cyrus@unspecified-domain
which your MTA is qualifying as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, sounds like a FAQ entry about double Return-Paths and unqualified
envelopes is in order here. Can anyone give me a Q/A for doc/faq.html?
thanks,
Larry
