RE: PostgreSQL backend: a waste of time?

[+archive . info-cyrus]

--On Monday, November 25, 2002 4:36 PM +0100 Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| I think that's a very good idea, but we found that MySQL is much faster
| than Postgres, when there are no complex queries (this is the case here),
| so it might be a better idea to use MySQL.

Seems kinda ironic in a way---doesn't MySQL use BerkeleyDB? I guess it's all in the indexing/caching....

Amos