-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <20021226163734.GA5176@khazad-dum>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writ es: >On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote: >> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> >Here's the improved patch. It skips over the +Mailbox part of the >> >recipient, >> > >> Would it make sense to make the control more generic, such as >> downcase_account_name, and have it also apply to logins and other places >> besides LMTP? We have a number of users who were logging in with > >That's something that the canonical name remapping should do. I am not >touching that area right now (I need to understand that first). > >So, if someone does this, it won't be me. Besides, we HAVE to draw a line >somewhere, and tell the users to stop being wackos. So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same problem here with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a solution that doesn't require me to patch either postfix or cyrus, if possible. - -- Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key BA0349D2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE+IxO+oayJfLoDSdIRAltvAKC8gB4EguwlKduNX0TPc+nKLmof/QCgptWu /8Z3gqXlmy7eW3VrXNug1ho= =8OnW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----