-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Replacing the .i files with another syntax wouldn't be a good idea in my > > eyes. > > Replacing the .i files doesn't mean that they will not be supported > anymore.
As long as InitNG keeps parsing them, it's ok with me. :-) > > Sysadmins need a fast, intelligent, easy to > > manage init system, not a new-and-hyped event driven thingy. IMHO. > > InitNG internal events will simplify a lot of things, so don't see them > as evil. Evolution is unavoidable. You got me wrong: I did not state that event-driven service management is some kind of evil thing, but I think we shouldn't jump the gun on this. Let's just first finalize the old system before we start something new. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFHv5WMpEdE19y46cRAtd+AJ0RvVZ7CLBdgc7bQZnpPKxhv/2vggCghgei gJY+gpoBfL03re2PsCXKiEM= =2d/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
