Dave Miner wrote: > Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> ...Also, Frank L noted that the current Indiana >> image doesn't include the zfs gui. While we can do all of this via >> the zfs cli, perhaps we should consider including the zfs gui in the >> distribution for ease of use. It is a very good gui. However, it may >> require more dependent software than we want to consider. >> > > Without taking a position on this particular user interface being > included on an image... > > If it's in the repository, it's "in" the Indiana distribution. We > need to *not* be somehow thinking of things that happen to be on a > particular CD or USB image as being "preferred". The goal of any > particular image we create is not to make every possible user happy, > but to meet a particular set of requirements for a particular set of > users. I don't know if it is in the repository. That was part of my point. I will check on that. Part of my point was also that a tool like this might be considered useful on the livecd so that after the installer runs the user could invoke it to set the quotas on the datasets created.
I don't expect that we will offer all the software we own as part of the livecd image, just rambling about the possibility of additional livecd features. thanks, sarah ***
