(Narendra_Kumar.S.S, ssnkumar at gmail.com" wrote: > Is there any particular reason to keep it that way (Global first and > local next)? > Is it not a good idea to do patchadd (yes, of course the pkgadd also > will have to be changed to tread this path, if we accept this change) on > local first and global in the last? >
Because some packages (and therefore patches) may be inherited from the global zone. Dave
