> Vasiliy wrote: > > I was asked to provide design for Recursive > patching (design review > > is major entertainment for many especially install > design reviews and > > I just can not deny this, even by internal process > it is not required > > for this small case). > > > > I'm not sure I completely understand what you're > trying to say above, > but a design review is expected for all enhancements > to Solaris > features. That's how we operate, period. Smaller > enhancements might > have a smaller document, but just because you might > be adding only one > switch to an existing command (to cite a common > example) doesn't mean > you get to avoid a review. > > So is the rest of this message meaning to initiate a > design review of > its contents? If so, what is the requested date for > comments to be > supplied? > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > install-discuss mailing list > install-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/install-discus > s >
As well as I know enhancements does not require design reviews in Solaris process, however this is design and let us review it. But let focus on design review itself. I am ready for comments right now I do not have particular end date at least yet, but sooner you comment - better. vassun. This message posted from opensolaris.org
