Eliot: > -----Original Message----- > From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:03 PM > To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri > Cc: David Meyer; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Please respond: Questions from the > IESG as to whether aWG forming BOF is necessary for LISP > > > > So the question - that is not administrative - boils down > > imho to: can we exclusively concentrate on the LISP protocol(s) > > specifics leaving the issue of our confidence on the Loc/ID > > split and associated challenges open. That question deserves > > imho a specific discussion that should happen in the context > > of a BoF. > > I missed the part where anyone said that we should *exclusively* > concentrate on LISP. Where/when did that happen?
All items in the charter - see below - are exclusively oriented toward LISP protocols implementation specifics, and interworking: /Goals and Milestones: / /Mar 2010 Submit base LISP specification to the IESG for / Experimental. / /Mar 2010 Submit base ALT specification to the IESG for / Experimental. / /Mar 2010 Submit the LISP Interworking specification to the IESG / for Experimental. / /June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Allocation and Routing / of both EIDs and RLOCs to the IESG for Experimental. / /June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Securing the LISP Mapping / System to the IESG for Experimental. / /July 2010 Submit LISP for Multicast Environments to the IESG for / Experimental. thanks, -dimitri. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
