In order to make an ID/Loc split work on an Internet-wide ubiquitous
scale, we need very good solutions and/or greater understanding to some
hard questions such as what will be the granularity of the mapping
function (how large will the mapping table be and what granularity of
prefix will be in it), how to do the mapping, how to do liveness
detection, what the scaling properties of the mapping and liveness
detection functions is likely to be, and what the manageability,
security, and robustness implications are. I guess that while we are at
it we need to figure out if there are other issues, such as MTU, that
need consideration. 

If you want to do experimentation on a moderate scale, then answers to
these questions are not strictly needed. 

I didn't see any of these "hard issues" explicitly mentioned in the
proposed charter (although there is mention of "the LISP+ALT mapping
system"). Is this because the effort is intended to be focused on the
shorter term experimentation efforts (including experimental protocol
specs that allow the immediate experiments to occur), for which these
hard issues do not need to be answered? 

Thanks, Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Eliot Lear
Sent: 21 January 2009 08:56
To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Please respond: Questions from the IESG
as to whether aWG forming BOF is necessary for LISP

On 1/21/09 2:12 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote:
> All items in the charter - see below - are exclusively oriented toward
> LISP protocols implementation specifics, and interworking:
>    
Right.  This is a LISP WG.  There is nothing stopping anyone from 
creating another WG, assuming the work warrants it.  And again, the 
output is experimental docs.  No standardization choices are being made.

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to