On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:19:10AM -0800, Joe Touch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Jari Arkko wrote: > > Dave, > > > >> I see > >> you gave one example, the effect of delay or packet > >> drop...; actually we need a more tightly scoped > >> description even than that to build an experimental > >> design (e.g., effect on what, in what topology, > >> etc.). You get my point. > > > > Sure. I was just giving an example, and it know it was too vague. I > > think it would be great if the charter had specific language about this, > > or if writing the list of most important things to measure would itself > > be a deliverable. > > As I noted in my other post, this (and some other suggestions on > experiment plans, etc.) seems like a great idea to document in an IRTF > group (or RRG subgroup) on 'experimenting with the LISP protocol > documented in the LISP WG', but outside the scope of the LISP WG itself.
Well said.
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
