+1 Regards,
Behcet ----- Original Message ---- > From: Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> > To: Jari Arkko <[email protected]> > Cc: Internet Area <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, October 12, 2009 10:28:19 AM > Subject: Re: [Int-area] intarea charter > > Hi Jari, > > On 09-10-12 11:18 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > The second possibility is to create two groups, a discussion forum and a > document development group. The benefit of this approach is that the two > roles > are clearly separated and similar to what has been done on other areas. Two > sets > of chairs would be needed, and at least the ones for the document part would > not > be the ADs. A potential downside is that if we create a new group in a place > where we traditionally have not had that much work, we might open an avenue > for > publishing unnecessary documents, documents that were rejected by existing > working groups or BOFs, etc. > > I support this option. The intarea meeting could be a gatekeeper for the > intwg > to keep such (useless, rejected) documents out. i.e. Charter items for the > intwg > need to have been discussed in intarea and found sufficient support prior to > inclusion. > > Cheers > Suresh > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
