Margaret, Scott,
The responsible AD(s) can approve changes to WG milestones without the
need to recharter. So, as long as we don't provide a list of work
items in the charter text, adding new work items to the milestone list
will not require re-chartering. I think we should add a milestone (or
a set of milestones) for each new work item, after we have accepted
the work item as a working group document, so that it is clear what we
are working on and when we expect it to complete.
Yes.
I am not entirely sure what the line "Significant new work items will
be brought for approval to the IESG" means. I think that should
either be better explained or removed. The TSVWG has the following
wording, which I prefer:
Additional work [...] in TSVWG must satisfy four
conditions: (1) WG consensus on the suitability and projected quality
of the proposed work item. (2) A core group of WG participants with
sufficient energy and expertise to advance the work item according to
the proposed schedule. (3) Commitment from the WG as a whole to
provide sufficient and timely review of the proposed work item. (4)
Agreement by the ADs, who, depending on the scope of the proposed
work item, may decide that an IESG review is needed first.
This would be much better. Thanks.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
