Margaret, > Although I support the use of milestones to track work items, I would > prefer to see the SEAL milestone dropped from the charter until we can > confirm that the above conditions have been met for that item. I > personally think they have been demonstrated for the other two items > (IPID and tunneling issues), but I would not object to holding off on > those items if anyone else would prefer that we check that these > conditions have been met before including them.
It may come as no great surprise, but I prefer to retain the three milestones currently on the list. Fred (still +1 for the wg) [email protected] > Margaret > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
