There are other ideas around, that could be applicable in MANETs. You could check draft-briscoe-intarea-ipv4-id-reuse
Teco Op 30 mrt 2011, om 14:21 heeft Charles E. Perkins het volgende geschreven: > > Hello Teco, > > Is it possible that the SMF usage is not vulnerable to > the pitfalls noted in the intarea draft? Usually we > don't picture NAT boxes in the MANET routing paths... > > Regards, > Charlie P. > > > On 3/30/2011 5:01 AM, Teco Boot wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> The current text in intarea-ipv4-id-update is "no current deployments >> are known". I read this as a statement in general. Then, it is not correct. >> I am fine with discouragement of usage of systems that use IP_ID for DPD, >> but such systems are around. >> >> Teco >> >> >> Op 30 mrt 2011, om 13:46 heeft Joe Touch het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Hi, Teco, >>> >>> On 3/30/2011 4:29 AM, Teco Boot wrote: >>>> Sorry for x-posting. But there is a conflict in: >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-smf >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update >>>> >>>> SMF has a duplicate packet detection function based on the IPv4 >>>> ID field. So text in ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update section 4 >>>> is not correct, in that there would be no deployments for such. >>> >>> SMF is experimental. When we talk about deployments of duplicate detection, >>> we're focused on standards-based systems. >>> >>> Note that ipv4-id-update is standards-track. >>> >>>> That said, SMF deployment with IPv4 DPD on IP-ID would be limited. >>>> >>>> What to do? >>> >>> IMO, recommend H-DPD and change the discussion to explain why the ID >>> shouldn't be used for DPD (the text is basically already there - it >>> mentions the idea, but then explains that it's not likely to work anyway). >>> >>> Use of the IP ID for this purpose is problematic for a variety of reasons, >>> which is why ipv4-id-update deprecates use of that field for that purpose. >>> >>> Joe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
