Hi, all,
I'm getting back to updating this doc, and wanted to come back to this
issue...
Is there a reason why the mechanism proposed for IPv6 (which does not
reliably include an ID field) is insufficient for IPv4?
Joe
On 3/30/2011 7:10 AM, Joe Macker wrote:
Yes this is an optional duplicate detection scheme and is an example of use in
practice.
Also As Teco mentioned this intended for limited use in edge network multicast
systems.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Teco Boot wrote:
Sorry for x-posting. But there is a conflict in:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-smf
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update
SMF has a duplicate packet detection function based on the IPv4
ID field. So text in ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update section 4
is not correct, in that there would be no deployments for such.
That said, SMF deployment with IPv4 DPD on IP-ID would be limited.
What to do?
Teco
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
