Hi Med,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:10 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: > Dear Lars, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org >>[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Eggert, Lars >>Envoyé : vendredi 6 juillet 2012 09:40 >>À : Alissa Cooper >>Cc : Internet Area >>Objet : Re: [Int-area] ACTION REQUIRED: Extending working >>group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 >> >>On Jul 5, 2012, at 22:48, Alissa Cooper wrote: >>> With the changes to this draft in the -02 version, I'm >>having a little trouble seeing its purpose. It basically now >>seems like a shell for the recommendation in 3.3, with the >>analysis stuffed into appendices. But given that there is no >>stable proposal for the actual TCP option to be implemented, >>what is the purpose for advancing this document right now? I >>think I've heard that folks "needed to know what to >>implement," but does this document really resolve that problem >>given that even within the space of TCP-option-based solutions >>for this, there are multiple different proposals, none of >>which has been standardized? This document made more sense >>when it was just a comparison of the different potential >>solutions spaces. >> >>Fully agree with Alissa. An comparison of options would be >>fine. But 3.3 and other text go beyond a comparison. > > Med: FYI I added Section 3.3 after the Paris meeting where I asked the > question whether we need to add a recommendation or not. It seems to me I > heard more voices for having a recommendation in the document. A notification > has been sent to this mailing list in mid-april. Anyway, I'm open to record > the consensus of the WG: maintain or remove that section. > >> >>I also don't understand why INTAREA is entertaining work that >>is clearly intending to define new TCP options. > > Med: This draft is not about the TCP option but to analyze a set of solutions > to solve a problem already documented in RFC6069. > RFC 6069 is about TCP-LCD? Behcet _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area