Hi Med,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:10 AM,  <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote:
> Dear Lars,
>
> Please see inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org
>>[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Eggert, Lars
>>Envoyé : vendredi 6 juillet 2012 09:40
>>À : Alissa Cooper
>>Cc : Internet Area
>>Objet : Re: [Int-area] ACTION REQUIRED: Extending working
>>group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
>>
>>On Jul 5, 2012, at 22:48, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> With the changes to this draft in the -02 version, I'm
>>having a little trouble seeing its purpose. It basically now
>>seems like a shell for the recommendation in 3.3, with the
>>analysis stuffed into appendices. But given that there is no
>>stable proposal for the actual TCP option to be implemented,
>>what is the purpose for advancing this document right now? I
>>think I've heard that folks "needed to know what to
>>implement," but does this document really resolve that problem
>>given that even within the space of TCP-option-based solutions
>>for this, there are multiple different proposals, none of
>>which has been standardized? This document made more sense
>>when it was just a comparison of the different potential
>>solutions spaces.
>>
>>Fully agree with Alissa. An comparison of options would be
>>fine. But 3.3 and other text go beyond a comparison.
>
> Med: FYI I added Section 3.3 after the Paris meeting where I asked the 
> question whether we need to add a recommendation or not. It seems to me I 
> heard more voices for having a recommendation in the document. A notification 
> has been sent to this mailing list in mid-april. Anyway, I'm open to record 
> the consensus of the WG: maintain or remove that section.
>
>>
>>I also don't understand why INTAREA is entertaining work that
>>is clearly intending to define new TCP options.
>
> Med: This draft is not about the TCP option but to analyze a set of solutions 
> to solve a problem already documented in RFC6069.
>

RFC 6069 is about TCP-LCD?

Behcet
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to