Med,
My opinion, not as AD, is that this document should not make a
recommendation. This document should be strictly an analysis so that
we have a baseline understanding of all the existing solutions.
Brian
On 7/30/12 2:41 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear Lars,
Could be more explict and explain what is missing in
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 to reach that stage?
Thanks.
Cheers, Med
-----Message d'origine----- De : Eggert, Lars
[mailto:l...@netapp.com] Envoyé : vendredi 27 juillet 2012 18:29 À
: BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP Cc : sarik...@ieee.org; Internet
Area Objet : Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call
for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
On Jul 27, 2012, at 0:09, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
The argument I heard in Paris meeting for including a
recommendation is to help vendors to select the solution to
implement in their devices. They can not provide the same feature
using 8 implementation options. That argument makes sense to me.
We're not at the stage yet where we can recommend anything to
vendors. We first need to determine if there even is a solution
where the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
Lars
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing
list Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
