Hi Joe, > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > 发送时间: 2017年5月20日 11:41 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Tom Herbert > 抄送: int-area@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [Int-area] 答复: Is the UDP destination port number resource running > out?// re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-gue-04.txt > > > > On 5/19/2017 6:39 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > > If the saving is beneficial, it'd better to assign a dedicated port > > number for each UDP payload type( e.g., IP packet), rather than > > combining the UDP port number dedicated for GUE and the version field > > within the GUE header together to indicate whether the UDP payload is > > GUE or IP (or even other payload type if the GUE is devoted to help > > save the UDP port number resource for the IETF community:)) > FWIW, IANA strives to assign one port for a service.
Great. Hence IPvx should be taken as a service rather than taking IPvx and GUE as a service, IMO. > Services are expected to have version fields and subtype demultiplexing > indicators, to so that all message variants of current and future versions > can use > a single port number. Sure, the version field within the IPvx packet could be used for demultiplexing purpose. Best regards, Xiaohu > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
