To others on the list: yes, this is another example of unauthorized forwarding of private mail.
However, in this case I’m glad. In encourage others who have posted about this topic to make their position clear as well. Joe > On Oct 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Khaled Omar > Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:56 PM > To: 'Joe Touch' > Subject: RE: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) > >> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate? > > You can check all e-mails sent to the int-area WG discussing IPmix (IPv10). > >> I will not be participating further. > > This is up to you. > > Best regards, > > Khaled Omar > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:45 PM > To: Khaled Omar > Cc: Rolf Winter; int-area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) > > > >> On Oct 7, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> people started to participate > > Can you provide the list of who you think will participate? > > To make my position clear, I cared only about making sure the name does no > further damage to the IP version codepoint. I will not be participating > further. > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
