Hi, Regarding sending e-mails. I reply to the sender and Cc the int-area, sometimes I forget to Cc the int-area so I forward the e-mail again to the int-area.
Usually, I reply publicly when the sender Cc'd the int-area and privately in case of the sender is sending only to me so it is fine. > , I would like to say that people interested in IPmix should go somewhere > outside the IETF and work on their ideas. What's the problem in having a mailing list within the IETF to discuss IPmix I-D, I think people can participate freely once it will be created. Khaled -----Original Message----- From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 8:20 AM To: Joe Touch Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Int-area] FW: Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) Hi, So while I have previously pointed out to Khaled that he's not supposed to forward private email to the list (which he has repeatedly done), in this specific incident it seems to me that you did actually cc int-area here? It can be seen in the "CC" below, and I did receive the email you sent that Khaled repled to. Nontheless, I would like to say that people interested in IPmix should go somewhere outside the IETF and work on their ideas. There has already been press indicating that "the IETF is working on the successor to IPv6" which is just further causing problem with FUD regarding IPv6 deployment. On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Joe Touch wrote: > To others on the list: yes, this is another example of unauthorized > forwarding of private mail. > > However, in this case I’m glad. > > In encourage others who have posted about this topic to make their position > clear as well. > > Joe > >> On Oct 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Khaled Omar >> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:56 PM >> To: 'Joe Touch' >> Subject: RE: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) >> >>> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate? >> >> You can check all e-mails sent to the int-area WG discussing IPmix (IPv10). >> >>> I will not be participating further. >> >> This is up to you. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Khaled Omar >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:45 PM >> To: Khaled Omar >> Cc: Rolf Winter; int-area >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) >> >> >> >>> On Oct 7, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> people started to participate >> >> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate? >> >> To make my position clear, I cared only about making sure the name does no >> further damage to the IP version codepoint. I will not be participating >> further. >> >> Joe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
