I've reviewed this document and support publication. A couple silly thoughts below:
I was amused by the statement "which is commonly done in networks using the OSI protocol suite". I didn't know we still had those. Or perhaps all properties are true on the empty set? Since the mentions of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6 will be removed before publication, I would recommend mentioning RFC 9229 in the acknowledgements. I know that the first authors of both documents are good friends, but they still deserve credit. David On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 11:51 AM Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad= [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Intarea WG, > > This email triggers a WGLC for the “*IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6/>*” draft. > This document went through multiple revisions, and the chairs and authors > believe it is now ready for WGLC. > > Please (re)-review the draft and send your comments and feedback to > Intarea ML. > > Please note this is a 2-week WGLC ending on 09/26/2025 at 23:59:59 UTC. > > Thanks much and have a great WE! > > > Regards, > > > Juan Carlos & Wassim > > Internet Area WG Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
