I've read the draft. I think it's a very useful document. All my comments I provided to the authors after the IETF123 have been addressed. I believe the document is ready for the next step.
I recall some discussion in Madrid about the intended status: Std vs Informational. IMHO this document belongs to the standard track, because section 4 specifies the desired router behaviour. On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 4:51 AM Wassim Haddad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Intarea WG, > > > This email triggers a WGLC for the “IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop” draft. > This document went through multiple revisions, and the chairs and authors > believe it is now ready for WGLC. > > > Please (re)-review the draft and send your comments and feedback to Intarea > ML. > > > Please note this is a 2-week WGLC ending on 09/26/2025 at 23:59:59 UTC. > > > Thanks much and have a great WE! > > > Regards, > > > Juan Carlos & Wassim > > Internet Area WG Chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Cheers, Jen Linkova _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
